Setting the scene
By 2011, Japan operated 54 nuclear reactors, providing 30% of its electricity. The Fukushima Daiichi plant, built in the 1970s on Japan's east coast, had six reactors. The plant's seawall was 19 feet high, designed for a maximum tsunami of 18 feet, based on historical data. On March 11, 2011, at 2:46 p.m., a magnitude 9.0 earthquake—the fourth-largest ever recorded—struck 43 miles offshore. The quake automatically shut down reactors 1-3, but the tsunami arrived 40 minutes later.
What happened
The tsunami reached 49 feet, overwhelming the seawall and flooding the plant. It destroyed backup diesel generators and electrical switchgear in basements, causing a station blackout. Without power, cooling systems failed, and reactors 1, 2, and 3 overheated. Over the next days, hydrogen explosions blew apart reactor buildings 1, 3, and 4, and meltdowns occurred in three reactors. Radiation was released, forcing evacuation of 154,000 people from a 12-mile zone. The Japanese government initially downplayed the severity, rating it Level 4, then 5, then finally Level 7—the maximum, same as Chernobyl.
Why it still matters
Fukushima was the second-worst nuclear disaster in history, though no one died from acute radiation. It caused an estimated $200 billion in damages and cleanup costs. The disaster led Japan to shut down all nuclear plants (though some have restarted) and Germany to phase out nuclear power by 2022. It demonstrated that nuclear plants were vulnerable to beyond-design-basis events and that regulatory capture had led to inadequate safety measures. The disaster also showed the importance of transparent crisis communication—TEPCO and the government's initial secrecy eroded trust. Fukushima's contaminated water release, ongoing in 2023, remains controversial. The disaster effectively ended the nuclear renaissance and accelerated the shift to renewables.
Background
It prompted nuclear policy reviews in multiple countries.