Setting the scene
The Vandal sack of 455 followed the murder of Western Emperor Valentinian III in March 455 by followers of the usurper Petronius Maximus, who had forced Valentinian's widow Licinia Eudoxia to marry him. Eudoxia, daughter of Eastern Emperor Theodosius II, appealed to Genseric, king of the Vandals in North Africa, for help. Genseric had his own grievances—his son Huneric was betrothed to Eudoxia's daughter Eudocia, and the usurpation threatened this alliance. He also saw an opportunity for plunder.
What happened
In May 455, Genseric sailed from Carthage with a Vandal fleet and landed at Ostia. Petronius Maximus attempted to flee Rome but was killed by a mob. Pope Leo I met Genseric outside Rome and, as he had with Attila three years earlier, persuaded him to spare the city from burning and slaughter, though not from looting. For two weeks, Vandals systematically stripped Rome of its wealth—imperial treasures, gold and silver from temples, the gilded bronze tiles from the Temple of Jupiter Capitolinus, and even the imperial palace's valuables.
Why it still matters
Unlike the Visigothic sack of 410, which lasted three days and involved burning, the Vandal sack was methodical plunder without widespread destruction. Genseric took Licinia Eudoxia and her daughters Eudocia and Placidia back to Carthage as hostages—Eudocia married Huneric as planned. The term 'vandalism' derives from this sack, though it was less destructive than portrayed by later sources. The 455 sack demonstrated the Western Empire's impotence—Rome could not defend itself and relied on papal diplomacy. It accelerated the empire's collapse, which came 21 years later in 476.
Background
The episode showed how weak western authority had become. Even centuries later, this episode remains a reference point for how empires rise, fracture, and transform.